On 2010-01-24, at 8:41 AM, LuKreme wrote:
In quite a few of the long threads there's been a lot of ideas
thrown around that would be good plugins. And while I agree with
most of them, I don't want us to end up going down a path of
dismissing a feature by saying, "That can be a plugin."
Yes, that *can* be a plugin, but that doesn't mean we don't have to
consider the application making the tools and data and metadata
available to make such a plugin possible.
...
I think for Letters to really succeed it needs to not only be
powerful and Mac-like, but it also needs to be so extensible that
people will be left in slack-jawed amazement at what it is able to do.
I don't think any of the devs on the list are thinking that we're
going to save any work by pushing things off into the plugins. By
saying 'plugin' to anything that could reasonably be a plugin, we'll
be forcing ourselves to build a plugin architecture that addresses
anything you might want to change, not just the five plugins we
thought people might write.
_______________________________________________
[email protected] mailing list
List help: http://lists.ranchero.com/listinfo.cgi/email-init-ranchero.com
