On 1/25/10 10:02 PM, "Timothy Collett" <[email protected]> wrote:
>> Um, from what I'm seeing, that's EXACTLY what's happening. Move fast or you >> lose. And history shows that if it's not in 1.0, the chances of 2.0 are >> pretty damned small, contrary to popular meme. Why? Because if it's not in >> 1.0, the people who care about this feature don't USE 1.0, and so the >> overall need for it drops. They're off using something else, and so the >> people who are left didn't care anyway. > > And you're not even willing to consider the possibility that, "We won't commit > to it within the first week of the app's conception" means exactly that, and > nothing more? Given the vacuum that is actual useful information, I've nothing else to go on. Given that, I go with the cynic's view. If I'm right, I don't lose, and if I'm wrong, I win big. I like those kinds of odds. -- John C. Welch Writer/Analyst Bynkii.com Mac and other opinions [email protected] _______________________________________________ [email protected] mailing list List help: http://lists.ranchero.com/listinfo.cgi/email-init-ranchero.com
