Dan, the CSMA protocol within EMANE for the 80211abg model is a behavioral implementation since the actual protocol can not be implemented given the timing constraints.
I do not think the high delays are related to the contention window implementation. Providing additional information about your test (emulator deployment, traffic load, configuration files, etc.) may provide insight into what you are seeing. Kaushik B. Patel Adjacent Link LLC On 10/29/2015 11:10 AM, Dan O'Keeffe wrote: > Hello, > I notice on the EMANE wiki the following statement in regard to EMANE's > 802.11 implementation: > > "The emulation of unicast does not replicate exponential growth of the > contention window as a result of detected failures." > > Could someone elaborate on why this is the case? Is it complex to > implement for some reason, or is there some problem with the exponential > backoff that leads to poor performance? > > The reason I ask is that sporadically I see very high delays for > individual packets in an experiment I'm running (e.g. 20s), and I'm > wondering whether this could be a contributing factor. > > Thanks, > Dan > _______________________________________________ > emane-users mailing list > [email protected] > http://pf.itd.nrl.navy.mil/mailman/listinfo/emane-users > _______________________________________________ emane-users mailing list [email protected] http://pf.itd.nrl.navy.mil/mailman/listinfo/emane-users
