>
> I have been forced to switch to Apache::ASP for just that reason -
> OK I know: I could have pre- and post-processed everything on the way
> in and out of the graphics tools - but thats just *too* much bother.
>
> Let's go as close to the established de-facto standards as possible.
>
Question (so I can make the next version better): Embperl makes a lot
efforts to work with the code these Highlevel HTML editor produces. For
example our customers use MS Frontpage to edit pages which contains Perl
blocks, and Embperl is still able to interpret them afterwards (e.g. it
converts things like < back to <).
What problems you exactly have when using [ .. ] blocks? Is it that the perl
code is visible to the designers or is it that your editor breaks the perl
code? If it breaks the perl code, what does it do to the code?
Also consider code like <TR BGCOLOR=[+ $col +]> or even <TR [$ if $col
$]BGCOLOR="#ffffff"[$endif$]>, how should this look with the new syntax?
More comments on this topic would be very helpfull! Anything you say now has
the chance to go into the next version...
Gerald
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
