Gerald Richter wrote:
> I think including/"executing" plain html files, without interpreting them,
> in the way you describe it, is really usefull and I already have planed to
> implement it, but not in 1.3. It's on my roadmap for 2.0b2. Embperl 2.0 will
> be much more flexible, by the possibility to define your own syntax. So one
> Syntax will be just to do nothing with file. It will surely not a part of
> 1.3.0, because I don't like to make any changes in 1.3, but release 1.3.0
> very soon (hopefully this week).
>
Gerald, thanks very much (and, once again, everyone else who replied).
The new upcoming version of Embperl 2.0b2 sounds very cool! I look
forward to playing with it.
Best wishes
-Neil
p.s. I don't want to bog down people's emailboxes with "useless"
messages like this. And yet, I feel compelled to thank people when they
have taken the time and trouble to help. Etiquette - do I reply to the
list to make the thanks "public", or just to the person concerned?
Thoughts? TIA
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
