On Sun, Jan 20, 2002 at 03:23:19PM +0100, Gerald Richter wrote: > > attached one-line patch only adds table qualifier only if the column name > > exists in the $tab4f hash, which still isn't right, but its better. > > Why do you think it isn't right? As far as I see this should be ok
i was thinking of cases like '!Fields' => 'date(foo) AS bar', where "date" is in fact a column in the table too. there's also probably some case where confusing the field separator comma with function argument separator comma causes problems, but i can't think of anything that quotewords won't get around already.. -- - Gus --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
