On Fri, Dec 29, 2006 at 05:36:30PM -0500, Kenneth Lerman wrote: > > Should I commit it to HEAD or should I create a new branch?
I think you have given people (including the board) plenty of time to object, and I haven't seen any objection to these changes. I don't see any reason for you not to put them on HEAD. The 2.1 branch has existed for a while, and we're stabilizing it as time goes on. One of the main reasons we do that for major release versions is so that ongoing work on new features can happen (on HEAD) without destabilizing the release code. I think that scheme was wildly successful for the 2.0 series of releases and I hope we can keep it up for 2.1. I've used branches (for a short time) when a feature is not done but I still want people to have access to it if they choose, or help with it. That's not necessary for most changes. As for how exactly to use CVS, let's keep that off the list - one of us can help much better in IRC, or you can check out http://cvsbook.red-bean.com/cvsbook.html Chris ------------------------------------------------------------------------- Take Surveys. Earn Cash. Influence the Future of IT Join SourceForge.net's Techsay panel and you'll get the chance to share your opinions on IT & business topics through brief surveys - and earn cash http://www.techsay.com/default.php?page=join.php&p=sourceforge&CID=DEVDEV _______________________________________________ Emc-developers mailing list Emc-developers@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/emc-developers
