the way the baud rate table was used, the first entry
(300 baud) would never be matched. This is why 300 baud
did not work.
---
I also found the bug that prevented 300 baud from working. This fixes
it.
src/hal/classicladder/serial_linux.c | 7 ++++---
1 files changed, 4 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)
diff --git a/src/hal/classicladder/serial_linux.c
b/src/hal/classicladder/serial_linux.c
index 86f4435..92d79b9 100755
--- a/src/hal/classicladder/serial_linux.c
+++ b/src/hal/classicladder/serial_linux.c
@@ -64,14 +64,15 @@ char SerialOpen( char * SerialPortName, int Speed )
int BaudRate = -1;
int ScanBaudRate = 0;
fcntl(fd, F_SETFL, O_RDWR | O_NOCTTY ); /* perform blocking
reads */
- while( SerialSpeed[ ScanBaudRate ]!=Speed && SerialSpeed[
ScanBaudRate ]>=0 )
+ do
{
- ScanBaudRate++;
if ( SerialSpeed[ ScanBaudRate ]==Speed )
{
BaudRate = SerialCorres[ ScanBaudRate ];
+ break;
}
- }
+ ScanBaudRate++;
+ } while ( SerialSpeed[ ScanBaudRate ]!=Speed && SerialSpeed[
ScanBaudRate ]>=0 );
switch (ModbusSerialDataBits)
{
case 8:
--
1.7.0.4
------------------------------------------------------------------------------
ThinkGeek and WIRED's GeekDad team up for the Ultimate
GeekDad Father's Day Giveaway. ONE MASSIVE PRIZE to the
lucky parental unit. See the prize list and enter to win:
http://p.sf.net/sfu/thinkgeek-promo
_______________________________________________
Emc-developers mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/emc-developers
