I am planning to merge the bldc-hall and bldc-sine components into one generic driver. The idea is that you will tell the driver what feedback mechanisms you have (or, actually, which ones you wish to use) and the driver will attempt to produce the best drive mode it can from that feedback.
I have tabulated the options here: https://spreadsheets.google.com/ccc?key=0AhjJW1-T6n7CdG5xeE10X1lLa042YmdWX2pvV00ydGc&hl=en#gid=0 I am thinking that further bitfield-options could choose between 3-output (U, V, W) and 6-output (U, /U, V, /V, W, /W) PWM amplitude values or 3-wire and 6-wire bit level values. It might even be possible to have base-thread functions in the latter modes that perform PWM on the bit values. However I suspect that that would struggle to manage more than a few kHz and so might not be very useful, especially as I can't think of many situations where you would use software PWM and have 6 wires available. Any thoughts? One thing I am considering is a bit-field to indicate if the driver should use the user-supplied encoder offset, or should measure it itself. There is a definite ambiguity about the Type12 arrangement in that table without that information. -- atp ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ The Next 800 Companies to Lead America's Growth: New Video Whitepaper David G. Thomson, author of the best-selling book "Blueprint to a Billion" shares his insights and actions to help propel your business during the next growth cycle. Listen Now! http://p.sf.net/sfu/SAP-dev2dev _______________________________________________ Emc-developers mailing list Emc-developers@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/emc-developers
