On Sat, Jul 16, 2011 at 12:01:26AM +0100, andy pugh wrote: > Experimenting with similar code: > > rtapi_delay(1000): > https://picasaweb.google.com/lh/photo/ywtNICZtPhXzhmC3u6mTXg?feat=directlink > > rt_busy_wait(1000): > https://picasaweb.google.com/lh/photo/vvFKC1bdvIhOgko2cYlEyw?feat=directlink
Over all the second one looks substantially more consistent. There are some real reasons to doubt the appropriateness of the current (udelay) implementation, as outlined in my first message. Therefore, I think we should change the rtapi_delay implementation to call rt_busy_wait, at least in master. Jeff ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ AppSumo Presents a FREE Video for the SourceForge Community by Eric Ries, the creator of the Lean Startup Methodology on "Lean Startup Secrets Revealed." This video shows you how to validate your ideas, optimize your ideas and identify your business strategy. http://p.sf.net/sfu/appsumosfdev2dev _______________________________________________ Emc-developers mailing list [email protected] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/emc-developers
