On Thu, Jan 12, 2012 at 01:58:11AM +0000, Chris Morley wrote:
> The reason for an integer rather then bool is in the future to facilitate
> setting the pin as an in or as an out.
> Or I could add two bools on for 'without HAL' one for in or out pin.
> Same reason for the name pintype rather then without HAL
If you insist on output pin functionality it's still independent to input hal
pin.
So having two bools - one for input other for output still would be better.
Integer
values are hard to understand and explain.
> I can see a use to having a HAL pin that follows an LED that is set
> programically
> rather then having to have a program set a HAL pin and an LED.
You may connect led to that pin. It may require some 'net' commands in your hal
files
but keep things more simple - LED will be still indicator.
Pavel
------------------------------------------------------------------------------
RSA(R) Conference 2012
Mar 27 - Feb 2
Save $400 by Jan. 27
Register now!
http://p.sf.net/sfu/rsa-sfdev2dev2
_______________________________________________
Emc-developers mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/emc-developers
