Hello all, There have been a large number of emails flying around concerning this subject. In order to understand where this fits into LinuxCNC, I would like to understand some things:
1 -- Where does this fit into the current (or future) design of LinuxCNC? 2 -- If I were to build a function (or package of functions) to solve the problem, what would its interface look like? 3 -- Aside from the interface to such a package, what would the rest of its specification look like? 4 -- What, then, would a test program for such a package look like? I suppose that what I'm really suggesting is that we convert this discussion into a project to build the next generation trajectory planner (if that's the right component name). I suggest that we start with items 1 and 2 (and maybe 4) and get some agreement. Then (concurrently) build a test platform and discuss #3. Various developers can then implement their own versions with varying internal specifications (acceleration limiting versus jerk limiting versus variations of gaussian, etc). I think this would make a nice little (or maybe not so little) project for collaboration. Regards, Ken ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ Live Security Virtual Conference Exclusive live event will cover all the ways today's security and threat landscape has changed and how IT managers can respond. Discussions will include endpoint security, mobile security and the latest in malware threats. http://www.accelacomm.com/jaw/sfrnl04242012/114/50122263/ _______________________________________________ Emc-developers mailing list Emc-developers@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/emc-developers