On 9/15/2012 2:47 PM, Jan de Kruyf wrote: > It looks to me, no more direct access to parport etc. Only throug a > "signed" kernelmodule. That is why I posted it. > > Dont know when it will become common practice, but obviously the evil > empire MUST have this to keep the dogs off the door. > > j. > > > On Sat, Sep 15, 2012 at 8:35 PM, Jon Elson <[email protected]> wrote: > >> Jan de Kruyf wrote: >>> For those who have not seen this yet: >>> >>> https://lwn.net/Articles/514985/#Comments >>> >>> it seems relevant. >>> >> Can anyone interpret this for us? >> >> Jon >>
Linus' assessment: http://www.wired.com/wiredenterprise/2012/06/microsoft-windows8-secure-boot/ Fedora and Ubuntu approach: http://www.pcworld.com/article/258153/windows_8_secure_boot_two_linux_distros_respond.html Regards, Kent ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ How fast is your code? 3 out of 4 devs don\\\'t know how their code performs in production. Find out how slow your code is with AppDynamics Lite. http://ad.doubleclick.net/clk;262219672;13503038;z? http://info.appdynamics.com/FreeJavaPerformanceDownload.html _______________________________________________ Emc-developers mailing list [email protected] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/emc-developers
