Ebo,

I would think this requirement is driven more from the availability and 
performance side of RT patches than from what certain distros do, and me must 
make a priority decision here between 'tracking a given distro' and 'having a 
recent kernel' - note we are just pulling our leg out of a version trap 
(although that came with a kernel version, not a distro)

of course it would be nice if we found a matching kernel in some distro, and 
that doesnt exclude such matching kernels are built - I'm discussing with Seb 
how we can set up a buildbot scheme for kernels - (NB: plural) so if somebody 
comes around and supplies patches that should find its way there so such a 
matching kernel for say Xenomai is automatically built 

assuming Lars is right - which I dont doubt - then the RT_PREEMPT kernel will 
have to be pretty much bleeding edge and generic, like this: 
http://www.kernel.org/pub/linux/kernel/projects/rt/3.6/

--

What I am completely unclear about, and what I would appreciate being educated 
about - what are the compatibility issues of running a non-distro kernel on say 
Ubuntu 10.04 or 12.04 - I do that all the time, and still have to fund a 
problem, so I'm a bit unsure what the actual value-add of distro-specific 
kernel patches is

- Michael





Am 11.10.2012 um 19:52 schrieb EBo:

> On Thu, 11 Oct 2012 08:02:14 +0200, Michael Haberler wrote:
>> ...
>> 
>> from what I collected so far, Linux 3.2.21 seems the latest 3.x
>> series supported by xenomai, which maps fine onto the Ubuntu
>> LTS/kernel version list:
>> http://kernel.ubuntu.com/~kernel-ppa/info/kernel-version-map.html
>> (precise LTS being the target platform)
>> 
>> for RT_PREEMPT I'm open to suggestions - please share; by default I'd
>> go for the same base version as the xenomai kernel
>> 
>> ...
> 
> my 2c would be to pick 3.2.14 for one of the kernel numbers as that is 
> the newest version that has been integrated into a couple of 
> distributions.  If Ubuntu has a different one they are throwing 
> resources into, then that might not be a bad choice after all.
> 
> Just to throw it out there, we could look at a TinyCoreLinux version.  
> That would run bootable off of a small USB drive, and can be installed 
> on a machine.  Jut thinking out loud...
> 
>   EBo --
> 
> ------------------------------------------------------------------------------
> Don't let slow site performance ruin your business. Deploy New Relic APM
> Deploy New Relic app performance management and know exactly
> what is happening inside your Ruby, Python, PHP, Java, and .NET app
> Try New Relic at no cost today and get our sweet Data Nerd shirt too!
> http://p.sf.net/sfu/newrelic-dev2dev
> _______________________________________________
> Emc-developers mailing list
> [email protected]
> https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/emc-developers


------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Don't let slow site performance ruin your business. Deploy New Relic APM
Deploy New Relic app performance management and know exactly
what is happening inside your Ruby, Python, PHP, Java, and .NET app
Try New Relic at no cost today and get our sweet Data Nerd shirt too!
http://p.sf.net/sfu/newrelic-dev2dev
_______________________________________________
Emc-developers mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/emc-developers

Reply via email to