On 10/17/2012 2:44 PM, Charles Steinkuehler wrote: > On that note, I think it might also be good to be able to separate out > building the GUI applications from the guts of LinuxCNC. As long as we're on the subject of non-guts stuff it would be nice for the build-documentation process to be separated more completely.
Having dpkg-checkbuilddeps yammering at me about all the cruft I haven't loaded because it's needed to generate documentation I didn't ask for is annoying. We already acknowledge on the wiki one aspect of this issue when we say "If installing simulator - don't apt-get install the rtai-modules-x.x.... package" but there's many more packages associated with the documentation. This isn't a show stopper, of course; just an annoyance. My short-term solution was to build a standard virtual machine that I cloned each time I wanted to test a different LinuxCNC sourcecode release in a clean-room environment. Regards, Kent ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ Everyone hates slow websites. So do we. Make your web apps faster with AppDynamics Download AppDynamics Lite for free today: http://p.sf.net/sfu/appdyn_sfd2d_oct _______________________________________________ Emc-developers mailing list [email protected] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/emc-developers
