On Mar 9 2013 9:26 PM, John Morris wrote:
> On 03/09/2013 06:22 AM, Matt Shaver wrote:
>> On Sat, Mar 9, 2013 at 2:02 AM, Matt Shaver <[email protected]> 
>> wrote:
>> To be clear: you can use libzmq (and any other 0MQ project with the
>> same license) in a GPLv2 project, both as a dynamic library, and in 
>> a
>> static link. If you make patches, you need to publish them, as 
>> usual.
>> There's no reason there would be any restrictions for GPLv2 projects
>> since the license is designed to work with all application licenses
>> including commercial closed source.
>
> Pieter's not right about this.  LCNC is GPLv2 ONLY, and libzmq is
> LPGLv3.  This compatibility matrix shows the combo is invalid:
>
> http://www.gnu.org/licenses/gpl-faq.html#AllCompatibility
>
> The trouble is that the GPLv2 license requires linked software to be
> 'conveyed' as GPLv2, and there are terms in LGPLv3 that are 
> incompatible
> with GPLv2.  I think Pieter's confusion may stem from the common
> assumption that since software with proprietary licenses may link
> against LGPL code, that all licenses are therefore compatible.  The
> difference is that proprietary software licenses wouldn't require the
> LGPL library to be 'conveyed' under the proprietary license, as the 
> GPL
> does.  This is a problem with 'copyleft' licenses, and why GPLv2 only
> and GPLv3 are incompatible.
>
> If Pieter wants to allow linking from GPLv2 ONLY projects, libzmq 
> should
> be relicensed LGPLv2+.
>
> As for LCNC, I still believe we should relicense GPLv2+, and I 
> believe
> there's no easy way out.
>
> Sorry to be the wet towel!

good points.  I think there are portions of LCNC which should be 
LGPL-(choose your version) so then can be used as linked libraries.  I 
am specifically thinking of HAL, but there are other independent 
libraryable portions of the code.

Anyway, that's my 2c

   EBo --


------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Symantec Endpoint Protection 12 positioned as A LEADER in The Forrester  
Wave(TM): Endpoint Security, Q1 2013 and "remains a good choice" in the  
endpoint security space. For insight on selecting the right partner to 
tackle endpoint security challenges, access the full report. 
http://p.sf.net/sfu/symantec-dev2dev
_______________________________________________
Emc-developers mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/emc-developers

Reply via email to