On 28 May 2013 03:28, Chris Morley <[email protected]> wrote:
>> Is it reasonable to push the component for folk to look over? It is >> using something I have not used before (unions) and probably warrants >> a bit of a looking at by an actual programmer. >> > Can't hurt to push it. I assume you work on it till it's fixed :) I have noticed that I am mallocing with the wrong sizeof() again (a hangover from trying to use a predefined union) I will fix that first. > I wonder it adding a debounce option to it would be useful. > A classic mux use is connecting to real switches. > Mux16 has a debouce option. This has a debounce too. It doesn't do gray-scale decoding (mux 16 does), but that can be achieved by ordering the inputs to suit. -- atp If you can't fix it, you don't own it. http://www.ifixit.com/Manifesto ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ Try New Relic Now & We'll Send You this Cool Shirt New Relic is the only SaaS-based application performance monitoring service that delivers powerful full stack analytics. Optimize and monitor your browser, app, & servers with just a few lines of code. Try New Relic and get this awesome Nerd Life shirt! http://p.sf.net/sfu/newrelic_d2d_may _______________________________________________ Emc-developers mailing list [email protected] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/emc-developers
