On 07/01/2013 01:11 AM, Michael Haberler wrote: > > Am 01.07.2013 um 07:25 schrieb David Bagby <d...@calypsoventures.com>: > >> Andy, Michael, >> The network accessibility of the data store and the associated API is >> key to both providing and understanding the functionality that this >> approach could provide. >> Is there a proposed design document that lays out the API? > > not yet, this is the time to contribute your thoughts on the issue > > the way I envisage it to be is to be rather pythonic than c-ish, namely using > name/value pairs as arguments rather than say positional arguments, which > seems to me more suitable to the case and more extensible that a C binding > > on the operative level what I'll as soon as I'm back do is spin out a branch > which has protobuf support and zmq examples in place so work can start 'in > tree' on the issue > > - Michael > > will the toolstore be only for linuxcnc or also for machines running just HAL?
the python binding key:value sounds to me like a dict for each tool, a dict allows different key sets for different tools( the broach has keys that the grinding wheel does not ) will tool related data like spindle rpm and coolant be in the toolstore? thx andy thx michael tomp ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ This SF.net email is sponsored by Windows: Build for Windows Store. http://p.sf.net/sfu/windows-dev2dev _______________________________________________ Emc-developers mailing list Emc-developers@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/emc-developers
