I like python and find it easier to understand and write programs in and hope more of LinuxCNC can use it. But I don't have a clue if that makes any difference in the overall scope of things.
JT On 7/2/2013 5:51 AM, Schooner wrote: > >>"the way I envisage it to be is to be rather pythonic than c-ish, > namely using name/value pairs as arguments rather than say positional > arguments" << > > Whatever you want to achieve can be done in C / C++, dicts, hash tables, > dawgs etc. > There are C/C++ apis for all the databases too > > Given that python was written in C and the python used in linuxcnc > relies upon bindings written in C, it slightly dresses a personal > preference as a necessity. > > But then I don't like python and would also prefer that it did not gain > any further hold on the project:-D > > So long as I can access the resulting tool (table/database/whatever) in > C/C++ from components I will be happy > > regards > > > ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ > This SF.net email is sponsored by Windows: > > Build for Windows Store. > > http://p.sf.net/sfu/windows-dev2dev > _______________________________________________ > Emc-developers mailing list > Emc-developers@lists.sourceforge.net > https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/emc-developers ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ This SF.net email is sponsored by Windows: Build for Windows Store. http://p.sf.net/sfu/windows-dev2dev _______________________________________________ Emc-developers mailing list Emc-developers@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/emc-developers
