On 16 July 2013 12:46, Kenneth Lerman <[email protected]> wrote:
> In thinking about some non-traditional machines, for example lathes with > multiple cross-slides and/or chucks, I could imagine having multiple > concurrent active sources and motions. I am not absolutely sure that this is impossible in the current architecture. it seems to me that the interpreter could be persuaded to (optionally) decouple XYZ and UVW moves. Then the question is whether they can be decoupled at the motion level. It seems possible on the servo-thread update rate section. I haven't looked to see if there is any way for the intermediate stage to not "block" an XYZ move waiting for a UVW move to finish (and vice-versa) -- atp If you can't fix it, you don't own it. http://www.ifixit.com/Manifesto ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ See everything from the browser to the database with AppDynamics Get end-to-end visibility with application monitoring from AppDynamics Isolate bottlenecks and diagnose root cause in seconds. Start your free trial of AppDynamics Pro today! http://pubads.g.doubleclick.net/gampad/clk?id=48808831&iu=/4140/ostg.clktrk _______________________________________________ Emc-developers mailing list [email protected] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/emc-developers
