On Aug 11 2013 10:49 AM, Sascha Ittner wrote: >>Note that once conversion is done there remains no code in task which >> has to be >>C++, as Python bindings for all moving parts will be available. I >> would have no >>parting pains with the task code, and if somebody would want to redo >> this in >>Python, it is time to start thinking to bring the - sorry, pathethic >> - >>implementation of the task state machine into a comprehensible and >> adaptable >>form, for instance by using the fysom.py state machine framework. > > I agree that a clean redesign of that part would be a big progress as > I > experienced the pain caused by the attempt to understand the code. > But I'm not > sure if Python is adequate for such a integral component (I'm > thinking about the > usage on resource limited systems). Why not try a clean > implementation in C?
this is what I was trying to say in my previous email. EBo -- ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ Get 100% visibility into Java/.NET code with AppDynamics Lite! It's a free troubleshooting tool designed for production. Get down to code-level detail for bottlenecks, with <2% overhead. Download for free and get started troubleshooting in minutes. http://pubads.g.doubleclick.net/gampad/clk?id=48897031&iu=/4140/ostg.clktrk _______________________________________________ Emc-developers mailing list Emc-developers@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/emc-developers
