On 03/03/2015 08:37 AM, Robert W. Ellenberg wrote: > tp: fix for "climbing" behavior in rigid tapping > > It turns out we were always setting the tp goalPos to be the endpoint of > the most recently added segment. Unfortunately, this assumption breaks > on rigid tapping, where the "end point" is somewhere past the start > point (but motion stops early once the spindle isn't synced). Hmm, I've noticed at the end of a G33.1 cycle, as the spindle reverts to forward rotation, the Z axis remains synched to the spindle for a moment, and starts toward the workpiece again. This probably lasts 50 - 100 ms, which seems awfully long before it recognizes that the spindle has reversed at the end of the withdrawal from the thread.
Is this the behavior you are describing above? Jon ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ Dive into the World of Parallel Programming The Go Parallel Website, sponsored by Intel and developed in partnership with Slashdot Media, is your hub for all things parallel software development, from weekly thought leadership blogs to news, videos, case studies, tutorials and more. Take a look and join the conversation now. http://goparallel.sourceforge.net/ _______________________________________________ Emc-developers mailing list [email protected] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/emc-developers
