On Dec 23 2015 9:17 AM, Sebastian Kuzminsky wrote: > On 12/23/2015 09:08 AM, Jeff Epler wrote: >> I would like to see jepler/linuxcnc-mirror moved to the linuxcnc >> organization, making our presence on github more official. However, >> I >> envision that it would still be a secondary system and that we'd >> continue >> to maintain our own primary git repository on git.linuxcnc.org. >> >> Other repositories such as the one that generates the new >> www.linuxcnc.org website could also be moved to the linuxcnc github >> organization. >> >> This doesn't imply transitioning to other github services. For >> instance, I am not proposing moving bug trackers at this time. But >> this >> would create the opportunity for us to do it in the future. >> >> Please voice your thoughts about this. It's my hope that we can >> reach a >> consensus on the list and move forward. > > I am in favor of this proposal. > > I will be happy to move the www.linuxcnc.org website archive from > SebKuzminsky/wlo into the github linuxcnc organization, and make sure > the automation that builds it is updated to match. > > > Though Jeff specifically did not propose moving the bugtracker, I > will > propose that we start accepting bug reports on github in addition to > accepting them on sourceforge. If this proposal is accepted, I > volunteer to update our docs and the www.linuxcnc.org website to > reflect > the choice of bugtrackers available.
I would suggest migrating the bugtracker fully to github unless there is some mechanism to forward the bugs and reports. The issue here is that once you have two streams of bugs and reports it will be a pain to keep them all synced up. I mean what do you do when you have duplicate bugs on duplicate systems... It is a pain to keep track of. EBo -- ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ _______________________________________________ Emc-developers mailing list [email protected] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/emc-developers
