On 06/28/2016 08:43 AM, Moses McKnight wrote:
> In accordance with the recommendation from the last IRC meeting, I plan to 
> make
> a "feature freeze" and make a new branch for the next release in the near
> future.  The joints/axes project merge is a pretty major thing and we would 
> like
> to release this sooner than later.

This is a good plan.  I'm looking forward to the next stable release.


> So does anyone that have a feature or something you are working on that you
> would like to get in before the release?

Francis Tisserant and i started work on revamping how our translations 
are handled, but it's not going to be ready for this release.  Once it's 
ready I'll merge it into master (this will be after you make the stable 
branch).

So what i'm saying is, i've got nothing special that i want to get in to 
the next stable release.  I'll focus on stabilizing from here on.


> Another item I'm considering is changing the version to 3.0 for the next
> release.  Any thoughts pro or con?  If we don't change it this time, I would
> recommend using 2.8 now, 2.9 for the next major release and then 3.0 (instead 
> of
> 2.10 etc)
The version is just a number to me, as long as it's monotonically 
increasing I'm happy.

I see no reason that .10 should be disallowed or should trigger the 
change to 3.0.  If 3.0 follows 2.9 by policy, then we should just drop 
the decimal point, it doesn't add anything at that point.

$0.02


-- 
Sebastian Kuzminsky

------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Attend Shape: An AT&T Tech Expo July 15-16. Meet us at AT&T Park in San
Francisco, CA to explore cutting-edge tech and listen to tech luminaries
present their vision of the future. This family event has something for
everyone, including kids. Get more information and register today.
http://sdm.link/attshape
_______________________________________________
Emc-developers mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/emc-developers

Reply via email to