On 09/04/2016 12:01 AM, andy pugh wrote:
> On 3 September 2016 at 23:24, Kirk Wallace <[email protected]> 
> wrote:
>> I just finished a first pass at G76 tapered threading.
>> My code is here:
>> http://www.wallacecompany.com/tmp/G76/G76-7b.cc
>
> Just so we don't tread on each-others's toes here.
> You appear to be using D to define the taper?
> I know why you chose this, it is because nothing else is available.
> However it clashes with my (un-merged) multi-spindle patch:
> https://github.com/LinuxCNC/linuxcnc/blob/andypugh/JA14_multispindle/configs/sim/axis/lathe_multispindle/README
>
> Ideally I would use E for spindle number, but E is taken. I suspect
> that entry and exit tapers are very rarely used, and that E is
> "wasted" but we probably shouldn't go breaking existing G-code.
>
> Perhaps the Cabal needs to decide who gets to claim D in G76 :-)

The D conflict is new to me, so I don't know how to respond. I too 
thought entry/exit tapers would be rarely used but Smid seems to have 
them in his threading examples, so I thought it would be worth the 
effort to provide for them.

> Is your pitch defined along the Z axis, or along the surface? Is Steve
> B still around?

The lead is along the Z axis, in other words the feed is adjusted using 
the tangent of the thread taper angle for any tapers used. (Crud, I 
forgot to check if it is the included angle or the angle to the axis. I 
need to fix this.)

Even with two line codes, Fanuc has multiple features encoded in a 
parameter's value, such as two digits for one feature and two for 
another. This would tend to break old LinuxCNC code, except E uses 
0,1,2, and 3 for the entry taper locations. Adding a tens digit might be 
used for something. Adding a G76.1 code may be an option too.


-- 
Kirk Wallace
http://www.wallacecompany.com/machine_shop/
http://www.wallacecompany.com/E45/

------------------------------------------------------------------------------
_______________________________________________
Emc-developers mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/emc-developers

Reply via email to