NOTE: There is now a pull-request for the docuentation changes from the original poster to the forum
On 28 November 2016 at 06:45, Chris Morley <[email protected]> wrote: > Just so you do get some answer... I assume that everyone was distracted by turkey. > I agree with removing the mask requirement if the feature is safe. The mask also controls: * whether G43 is automatically applied: Not safe * Whether subroutines are passed a #<_n_args> parameter: Probably safe * Something about mixed-case names. The docs say )-word names, the example is a HAL pin: Not sure > Can't immediately see any problem with reading data from the INI. Indeed, that seems safe. > What is unsafe about allowing gcode HAL access (other then there are > limitations) ? The limitations mean that is can have unexpected effects. -- atp "A motorcycle is a bicycle with a pandemonium attachment and is designed for the especial use of mechanical geniuses, daredevils and lunatics." — George Fitch, Atlanta Constitution Newspaper, 1916 ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ _______________________________________________ Emc-developers mailing list [email protected] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/emc-developers
