>This new Asus Z370-A II mobo has builtin gfx, and dmesg does not identify
>it. its carrying a 9nth gen i5, 6 core 3.7GHz cpu. Whatever its gfx is,
>is quick. glxgears reports:
>23060 frames in 5.0 seconds = 4611.867 FPS.
>But latency-test blows a 4 u-s reading out when a beep from incoming mail
>occurs puttin it above 100 u-secs, and that is while running the stretch
>iso's 4.9.0-11-rt-amd64 #1 SMP PREEMPT RT Debian 4.9.189-3+deb9u2
>kernel. That would not do for software stepping IMNSHO.

I have a Z370 and Z390 .... but ubuntu not debinan .... I have not problem
with acustic alarm .... ut latecy is about 40.000 ... no good for stepper
... but enought for ethercat.

bkt


Il giorno dom 15 dic 2019 alle ore 01:20 Gene Heskett <ghesk...@shentel.net>
ha scritto:

> On Saturday 14 December 2019 15:38:17 Alec Ari via Emc-developers wrote:
>
> > Hi everyone,
> > Are people more willing to risk possibly higher latency with RTAI to
> > use Intel integrated graphics to save them the trouble of using FBDEV
> > or VESA drivers? If so, I can re-enable these Kconfig options. If you
> > haven't had latency trouble before with Intel graphics, I can't
> > imagine a newer kernel making this worse. Are there a lot of people on
> > nVIDIA hardware too or just Intel?
> >
> > Alec
> >
> I now have 4 intel powered boxes and one rpi4 but its running a
> preempt-rt I built for armhf, and plenty good enough for mesa cards. The
> intel stuff except for this new house box, are all running i915 drivers,
> and plenty fast enough for the 5i25's and 7i76D's they drive. I would
> not consider any of them fast enough to do software stepping.  The now
> old D-525-MW mobo's are of coarse magic yet with 4 or 5 microsecond
> latencies. They would software step, but are already using 5i25's which
> can step 10x faster. X & Y on the 6040 can move at 192 ipm. With my
> drivers, what comes with it are junk.
>
> Make of that what you will Alec. Likely not much as I no longer have a
> software stepper online.
>
> This new Asus Z370-A II mobo has builtin gfx, and dmesg does not identify
> it. its carrying a 9nth gen i5, 6 core 3.7GHz cpu. Whatever its gfx is,
> is quick. glxgears reports:
> 23060 frames in 5.0 seconds = 4611.867 FPS.
> But latency-test blows a 4 u-s reading out when a beep from incoming mail
> occurs puttin it above 100 u-secs, and that is while running the stretch
> iso's 4.9.0-11-rt-amd64 #1 SMP PREEMPT RT Debian 4.9.189-3+deb9u2
> kernel. That would not do for software stepping IMNSHO.
>
> But this machine will never cut metal.
>
> Cheers, Gene Heskett
> --
> "There are four boxes to be used in defense of liberty:
>  soap, ballot, jury, and ammo. Please use in that order."
> -Ed Howdershelt (Author)
> If we desire respect for the law, we must first make the law respectable.
>  - Louis D. Brandeis
> Genes Web page <http://geneslinuxbox.net:6309/gene>
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> Emc-developers mailing list
> Emc-developers@lists.sourceforge.net
> https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/emc-developers
>

_______________________________________________
Emc-developers mailing list
Emc-developers@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/emc-developers

Reply via email to