On Monday 31 August 2020 12:56:10 andy pugh wrote:

> I think that there are problems with the buildbot, but I know not
> what.
>
> Four of the builders are failing runtests, but it isn't so much the
> tests that are failing as LinuxCNC itself.
>
> http://buildbot.linuxcnc.org/buildbot/builders/1610.rip-stretch-rtpree
>mpt-i386/builds/2206/steps/runtests/logs/stdio (need to scroll right to
> the end)
>
> As far as I know this isn't a problem with the LinuxCNC code, that has
> not changed for several days and there have been many test passes in
> that time.

I don't see any changes since I built it late yesterday morning on the pi 
with no unusual results. So its my unscientific guess that something has 
gone wonky with the buildbot.

> And it makes no sense for rip-stretch-rtpreeemt-i386 to fail and
> rip-stretch-amd64 to pass.
> (with the Wheezy builds there is an i386 pass and an amd64 fail)
>
> I _was_ planning to release 2.8 this weekend, and have pushed the tag.
> But the buildbot won't make the debs without a clean build.


Cheers, Gene Heskett
-- 
"There are four boxes to be used in defense of liberty:
 soap, ballot, jury, and ammo. Please use in that order."
-Ed Howdershelt (Author)
If we desire respect for the law, we must first make the law respectable.
 - Louis D. Brandeis
Genes Web page <http://geneslinuxbox.net:6309/gene>


_______________________________________________
Emc-developers mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/emc-developers

Reply via email to