I wonder how that filters down to PyQt which we use if at all?
It does sound like a bait and switch thing...
From February onward, everyone, including open-source Qt users, will require valid Qt accounts to download Qt binary packages
AFAIK you don't need any Qt binary packages to use PyQt5 but no clue how this affects the PyQt5 folks.
JT On 1/13/2021 12:55 PM, andy pugh wrote:
https://www.qt.io/blog/qt-offering-changes-2020 Has anyone considered the ramifications of the requirement to have a License to develop with QT? This sounds very similar to the EtherCAT position, and it was decided some time ago that made EtherCAT something that we couldn't distribute as part of LinuxCNC. And does the recent switch to commercial-only support matter to us?
_______________________________________________ Emc-developers mailing list [email protected] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/emc-developers
