Hi Andy, That's fine if someone else packages LinuxCNC but they'll need to do against my latest debs (which I have yet to build.) I just wanted to help out so I'm not relying on other people's development time just for some testing. The plan is to move to the 5.4 kernel so the 4.19 debs would be just a final test before I roll out RTAI kernel 5.4 packages.
Alec On Saturday, October 29, 2022 at 10:59:40 AM CDT, andy pugh <bodge...@gmail.com> wrote: On Sat, 29 Oct 2022 at 08:02, Alec Ari via Emc-developers <emc-developers@lists.sourceforge.net> wrote: > Hi everyone, > > So I'm trying to host LinuxCNC + RTAI packages for Bullseye but I have to use > --enable-non-distributable=yes and there is no libreadline-gplv2-dev package > in Bullseye. Is it really an issue to post a LGPL/GPL mixed package? Who > would actually be upset by a conflicting GPL/LGPL license compatibility thing? I don't know the answer to the licensing question. But would it be an answer to backport (frontport?) the Buster version via your repository? Also, would it make sense to host the packages on the LinuxCNC repository instead? -- atp "A motorcycle is a bicycle with a pandemonium attachment and is designed for the especial use of mechanical geniuses, daredevils and lunatics." — George Fitch, Atlanta Constitution Newspaper, 1912 _______________________________________________ Emc-developers mailing list Emc-developers@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/emc-developers
