Just so you at least hear a voice... I hear what you are saying, I remember this has come up before but we never did get another build bot up and running that I know of. Single point of failure.
I'm sorry I can't help you. Is there other options for the future that you know of? Is there any complete documentation of the process of releasing, so others could try to understand? Chris Sent from my Galaxy -------- Original message -------- From: andy pugh <bodge...@gmail.com> Date: 2022-11-09 5:16 p.m. (GMT-08:00) To: EMC developers <emc-developers@lists.sourceforge.net> Subject: Re: [Emc-developers] 2.9-pre1 On Thu, 10 Nov 2022 at 00:14, Rod Webster <r...@vehiclemods.net.au> wrote: > It's not useful to have RTAI in Bullseye as we don't have any debs for that > platform. Well, this comes back to a question I asked some time ago (which did not get a single reply (30th Oct 18:15 GMT timestamp)). What _should_ we be releasing 2.9 on? Currently the LinuxCNC buildbot only builds for Buster- and the Debian system is doing Bookworm+ I have no control over the LinuxCNC buildbot and Seb (who does) has said nothing on the question. Basically the buildbot is integral to our current release process, and I have no idea what is going on or what the plan is. This is not a tenable position for a co-opted release manager to be in. I can't do this by myself. -- atp "A motorcycle is a bicycle with a pandemonium attachment and is designed for the especial use of mechanical geniuses, daredevils and lunatics." — George Fitch, Atlanta Constitution Newspaper, 1912 _______________________________________________ Emc-developers mailing list Emc-developers@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/emc-developers _______________________________________________ Emc-developers mailing list Emc-developers@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/emc-developers
