Andy, I can’t do it either, but I really appreciate all the help you've given to LinuxCNC.
I agree that Bullseye would be an appropriate target for the 2.9 release. I have compiled master for Bullseye and am currently working on compiling Linux-5.15.76-rt53 on Amd64. I have master running on Linux-5.15.73-rt52 running on my RPi4 but since the merge of the rt stuff in to Linux, I haven’t been able to successfully build a PREEMPT_RT kernel for either RPi4 or AMD64. Alan > Date: Sat, 12 Nov 2022 01:05:30 +0000 > From: andy pugh <bodge...@gmail.com> > To: EMC developers <emc-developers@lists.sourceforge.net> > Subject: [Emc-developers] 2.9 Release Manager Required. > Message-ID: > < > can1+yzuvr0ehgqwfzxyqgmaha-my3nj4xfryulm2r1g6src...@mail.gmail.com> > Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" > > I can't do it. > > Previously the buildbot was integral to the process, but the buildbot only > builds for Buster- and I have no control over it. > > LinuxCNC is being built into Debian Bookworm, but I have no involvement in > this process, and no access rights. > > Debian Bullseye would be the logical release platform for 2.9. I could set > up my own build-farm (I have enough hardware) but that would be a lot of > work in an area in which I have no expertise. > > I have asked what the release platform should be, and there wasn't a single > reply. > > I will continue as a user and I will continue to offer my support on > the forum and mailing lists, I am not going anywhere, but I am both > ignorant of what the release policy should be and incapable of performing > the release manager role with the accesses and expertise that I have. > > -- > atp > "A motorcycle is a bicycle with a pandemonium attachment and is designed > for the especial use of mechanical geniuses, daredevils and lunatics." > ? George Fitch, Atlanta Constitution Newspaper, 1912 > _______________________________________________ Emc-developers mailing list Emc-developers@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/emc-developers
