On Tue, 11 Mar 2025, andy pugh wrote:
Date: Tue, 11 Mar 2025 00:33:32 +0000 From: andy pugh <bodge...@gmail.com> Reply-To: EMC developers <emc-developers@lists.sourceforge.net> To: EMC developers <emc-developers@lists.sourceforge.net>Content preview: On Sun, 9 Mar 2025 at 22:35, Steffen M??ller via Emc-developers < wrote: Sounds like we should get 2.9.4 uploaded and then see what happens. As I > stated > in an earlier post to this, I am confident that I'd mess the linuxcnc-gbp > branch > up. Would it be ok if I upload [...] Content analysis details: (-0.2 points, 6.0 required) pts rule name description ---- ---------------------- -------------------------------------------------- -0.0 SPF_PASS SPF: sender matches SPF record 0.0 RCVD_IN_VALIDITY_SAFE_BLOCKED RBL: ADMINISTRATOR NOTICE: The query to Validity was blocked. See https://knowledge.validity.com/hc/en-us/articles/ 20961730681243 for more information. [209.85.160.181 listed in sa-accredit.habeas.com] 0.0 SPF_HELO_NONE SPF: HELO does not publish an SPF Record 0.0 FREEMAIL_FROM Sender email is commonly abused enduser mail provider [bodgesoc[at]gmail.com] 0.0 RCVD_IN_VALIDITY_RPBL_BLOCKED RBL: ADMINISTRATOR NOTICE: The query to Validity was blocked. See https://knowledge.validity.com/hc/en-us/articles/ 20961730681243 for more information. [209.85.160.181 listed in bl.score.senderscore.com] 0.0 HTML_MESSAGE BODY: HTML included in message 0.0 RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_H3 RBL: Good reputation (+3) [209.85.160.181 listed in wl.mailspike.net] -0.1 DKIM_VALID Message has at least one valid DKIM or DK signature -0.1 DKIM_VALID_EF Message has a valid DKIM or DK signature from envelope-from domain -0.1 DKIM_VALID_AU Message has a valid DKIM or DK signature from author's domain 0.1 DKIM_SIGNED Message has a DKIM or DK signature, not necessarily valid 0.0 RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_WL Mailspike good senders Subject: Re: [Emc-developers] Debian Freeze on April 15th On Sun, 9 Mar 2025 at 22:35, Steffen M??ller via Emc-developers <
emc-developers@lists.sourceforge.net> wrote: Sounds like we should get 2.9.4 uploaded and then see what happens. As I
stated in an earlier post to this, I am confident that I'd mess the linuxcnc-gbp branch up. Would it be ok if I upload directly and we upload to that branch afterwards? I am afraid that I don't understand the gbp branch either. Didn't you
watch me struggle with it for two days in Stuttgart? -- atp "A motorcycle is a bicycle with a pandemonium attachment and is designed for the especial use of mechanical geniuses, daredevils and lunatics." ?? George Fitch, Atlanta Constitution Newspaper, 1912 _______________________________________________ Emc-developers mailing list Emc-developers@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/emc-developersSpeaking of Debian, is there any way that a current version of mesaflash can be included? The included version seems to be 3.4.9 from Oct 2023, Current is
3.5.11. Peter Wallace Mesa Electronics
_______________________________________________ Emc-developers mailing list Emc-developers@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/emc-developers
