I believe reference to FCC standard Class B statement in a user guide will clear this up. Most ITE is designed and tested for Class B operation. However, the statement which must accompany the equipment clearly requires the "user" to take action where radio/TV intereference results from the product in the intended application.
To my knowledge, this applies even moreso to "intentional radiator" equipment. The neighbor can complain to the FCC, who can and will shut down the offending transmitter. From: dmckean%paragon-networks.com List-Post: emc-pstc@listserv.ieee.org Date: 12/17/96 01:10:20 PM Subject: The Age Old Question of Interfering with Someone's Home Stereo ... Yes, the old question of interference from one home to another. I just had a friend (yes really, a friend) ask the following: He has a 100 Watt Shortwave radio transmitter/reciever setup in his home (a condo). All approved equipment. He operates in the 75m band (3.765 MHz). His antenna is in his attic out of view. He believes he is interfering with his neighbor's stereo who lives right next to him in the condo. He is extremely concerned about operating "within the law". Is he? I think he is. Only from what he's told me, it sounds like everything is ok. Doesn't the "must accept" on the FCC label make the burden of correction on the owner of the stereo? Thanks in advance. ******************************************************* ------------------------------------------------------- The comments and opinions stated herein are mine alone, and do not reflect those of my employer. ------------------------------------------------------- *******************************************************