Forwarded message:
From:     Self <Single-user mode>
To: pstc-...@ieee.org
Subject: UL1950/CSA C22.2 950 Third Edition; Telco Overvoltage Tests
List-Post: emc-pstc@listserv.ieee.org
Date: Fri, 9 Oct 1998 23:50:09 +0200


Dear Fellow members,

After the application of the Overvoltage Tests to telecom interfaces 
subjected to exposed plant, one of criteria for passing to the above 
specified standards is the application of a Dielectric Voltage 
Withstand Test or the Leakage Current Test. As such, if the 
manufacturer failed the Dielectric Voltage Withstand Test, 
manufacturer can choose to comply with the Leakage Current Test.

As the standard is written today, it is not necessary to apply a 600 
V to the telephone interface (to simulate a power line coming 
across the telephone interface) when conducting the Leakage 
Current Test. Application of the 600 V to the telephone interface 
when measuring Leakage per the Standards for Telephone 
Equipment UL1459 and CSA C22.2 225 was a common practice 
and makes sense. 

I believe there was a big mistake in overlooking this point when the 
UL1950/CSA C22.2 950 standard was developed. I know one 
manufacturer with a piece of equipment which was submitted to 
one NRTL and received Listing (because after failing Dielectric 
Strength Test, they passed the Leakage Current Test- obviously he 
passed since 600 V was not applied to the telco interface). When 
OEM submitted the same piece of equipment to another NRTL, 
they couldn't get Listing since engineer evaluating product applied  
600 V to the telco interface when measuring Leakage (even though 
standard does not require it) and the product failed the test.

Any comments, especially from pstc members who are also in the 
North American Standardization Committe for UL1950/CSA C22.2 
950?

---------
This message is coming from the emc-pstc discussion list.
To cancel your subscription, send mail to majord...@ieee.org
with the single line: "unsubscribe emc-pstc" (without the
quotes).  For help, send mail to ed.pr...@cubic.com,
j...@gwmail.monarch.com, ri...@sdd.hp.com, or
roger.volgst...@compaq.com (the list administrators).

Reply via email to