Ray, I agree with your interpretation. Besides your good reasons, testing each port individually assures as much repeatability and uniformity of application of the transient field as possible... Regards, Bob Tims Compliance Engineer Ericsson Messaging Systems Inc. robert.t...@ericsson.com
r...@isco.com wrote: > Erik; > > I have used IEC 1000-4-4:1995. EN should be muich the same. > > In section 8.2 "Execution of the test" - "The test plan shall specify" - > "sequence of application of the test voltage to the EUT's ports, each one > after the other or to cables belonging to more than one circuit, etc." > > I have understood this to mean that we test each "port" [generally one > connector or cable] sepatately, ["one at a time, one after the other"]. > Sometimes one "port" consists of one cable with connections going to more > than one circuit, in this case we test that cable as a whole ["cables > belonging to more than one circuit, etc." ]. > > I would be interested how others do this. > > Ray Hulinsky > > RCIC - http://www.rcic.com > Regulatory Compliance Information Center > > --------- > This message is coming from the emc-pstc discussion list. > To cancel your subscription, send mail to majord...@ieee.org > with the single line: "unsubscribe emc-pstc" (without the > quotes). For help, send mail to ed.pr...@cubic.com, > j...@gwmail.monarch.com, ri...@sdd.hp.com, or > roger.volgst...@compaq.com (the list administrators). --------- This message is coming from the emc-pstc discussion list. To cancel your subscription, send mail to majord...@ieee.org with the single line: "unsubscribe emc-pstc" (without the quotes). For help, send mail to ed.pr...@cubic.com, j...@gwmail.monarch.com, ri...@sdd.hp.com, or roger.volgst...@compaq.com (the list administrators).
