A couple of other thoughts:  

- Used to be that everyone thought X and Y cap's were hideously
fire-hazardous.  Perhaps the UL and CSA standards for line filters
require a can (ie fire enclosure) around them, even if they are approved
and even if the filter goes inside the outer (equipment) enclosure.

- Potting will allow you to meet reduced creepage and clearance that may
be crucial in obtaining decent high frequency attenuation from the
filter.

Regards,

Jim Eichner
> Senior Regulatory Compliance Engineer
Statpower Technologies Corporation
jeich...@statpower.com
http://www.statpower.com
Any opinions expressed are those of my invisible friend, who really
exists.  Honest.


> -----Original Message-----
> From: POWELL, DOUG [SMTP:doug.pow...@aei.com]
> Sent: Wednesday, December 08, 1999 2:20 PM
> To:   emc-p...@majordomo.ieee.org; Treg Listserv (E-mail)
> Subject:      RE: Open Frame EMI Filters
> 
> 
> Hello once again,
> 
> I have already received a number of replies to my query indicating
> that the
> metallic enclosure is required for low inductance coupling to the
> components
> or to prevent radiation between circuits within the product.  This is
> not my
> question.
> 
> Please remember that one of the criteria that I described for the open
> frame
> is the passing all applicable EMC tests.  This means that the
> open-frame
> design that I propose meets both radiated and conducted emissions
> levels,
> without the metallic box.  My questions deals more with why is the
> enclosure
> required if product passes the tests without it.  In the past I have
> designed a few products with a simple PCB for emissions control.  I
> compensated for the internal re-radiation problem.  
> 
> Recently I heard of a commercial EMI Filter company that says the
> enclosure
> is required and that the encapsulant is a requirement.  I disagree.
> 
> -doug
> 
> =======================================
> Douglas E. Powell
> Regulatory Compliance Engineer
> Advanced Energy Industries, Inc.
> 1625 Sharp Point Dr.
> Fort Collins, Colorado 80525 USA
> m/s: 2018
> ---------------------------------------
> 970-407-6410 (phone)
> 970-407-5410 (e-fax)
> 800-446-9167 (toll-free)
> mailto:doug.pow...@aei.com
> http://www.advanced-energy.com
> =======================================
> 
> 
> 
> > >
> > > Hello group,
> > >
> > > For years I have used off-the-shelf and custom EMI filters 
> > with a fully
> > > enclosed metal canister.  Why is this enclosure required?  Are
> there
> > > specific provisions in the standards?  My idea is to build 
> > up the filter
> > > circuit on a printed circuit board and  make it an integral 
> > part of the
> > > power supply.
> > >
> > > I am currently looking at EN133200 which has certain seal 
> > tests but after
> > > reviewing these, they all appear to be related to climatic or
> > environmental
> > > conditions.  If the product passes these tests without the 
> > enclosure it
> > > would seem that the product has passed, period.
> > >
> > > Alternatively I have considered removing the nomenclature 
> > "EMI filter" and
> > > simply call it an input module, then evaluate it as a part 
> > of the overall
> > > system.  If it passes the EMC and Product Safety 
> > requirements, can I call
> > > the job complete?
> > >
> > > Any thoughts?
> > >
> > > =======================================
> > > Douglas E. Powell
> > > Regulatory Compliance Engineer
> > > Advanced Energy Industries, Inc.
> > > 1625 Sharp Point Dr.
> > > Fort Collins, Colorado 80525 USA
> > > m/s: 2018
> > > ---------------------------------------
> > > 970-407-6410 (phone)
> > > 970-407-5410 (e-fax)
> > > 800-446-9167 (toll-free)
> > > mailto:doug.pow...@aei.com <mailto:doug.pow...@aei.com>
> > > http://www.advanced-energy.com <http://www.advanced-energy.com>
> > > =======================================
> > >
> > > ---------
> > > This message is coming from the emc-pstc discussion list.
> > > To cancel your subscription, send mail to majord...@ieee.org
> > > with the single line: "unsubscribe emc-pstc" (without the
> > > quotes).  For help, send mail to ed.pr...@cubic.com,
> > > jim_bac...@monarch.com, ri...@sdd.hp.com, or
> > > roger.volgst...@compaq.com (the list administrators).
> > >
> > >
> > 
> > 
> > 
> > 
> > ---------
> > This message is coming from the emc-pstc discussion list.
> > To cancel your subscription, send mail to majord...@ieee.org
> > with the single line: "unsubscribe emc-pstc" (without the
> > quotes).  For help, send mail to ed.pr...@cubic.com,
> > jim_bac...@monarch.com, ri...@sdd.hp.com, or
> > roger.volgst...@compaq.com (the list administrators).
> > 
> > 
> 
> ---------
> This message is coming from the emc-pstc discussion list.
> To cancel your subscription, send mail to majord...@ieee.org
> with the single line: "unsubscribe emc-pstc" (without the
> quotes).  For help, send mail to ed.pr...@cubic.com,
> jim_bac...@monarch.com, ri...@sdd.hp.com, or
> roger.volgst...@compaq.com (the list administrators).
> 

---------
This message is coming from the emc-pstc discussion list.
To cancel your subscription, send mail to majord...@ieee.org
with the single line: "unsubscribe emc-pstc" (without the
quotes).  For help, send mail to ed.pr...@cubic.com,
jim_bac...@monarch.com, ri...@sdd.hp.com, or
roger.volgst...@compaq.com (the list administrators).

Reply via email to