In a follow up to the same article a reader asks:

"What about 900+ MHz cordless phones? Are they in the same microwave
frequency? They seem to be more common than cell phones, and people tend to
talk longer with cordless phones. What's the health risk of those?"

I have often been curious about possible health hazards with these also.  I
do suppose, though, that the amount of power coming from a cordless phone is
at least several magnitudes smaller than from a cell phone.

Max Kelson
Evans & Sutherland



                -----Original Message-----
                From:   [email protected] [mailto:[email protected]]
                Sent:   Wednesday, December 01, 1999 10:35 AM
                To:     [email protected]
                Subject:        Re: Cell Phone Hazards? 


                I think the most important point made by the article of "Is
your cell phone 
                killing you?" in Zdnn is this: 

                "We found evidence of genetic damage in human blood," said
George Carlo, 
                WTR's chairman. "We have suggestions of excessive mortality
from brain 
                cancers among wireless phone users, and we have very clear
evidence of a 
                statistically significant higher risk of neuroepithelial
tumors. ..." and 
                "Many signs point to DNA damage as the likely culprit. Adey
has found a link 
                between low-intensity microwaves and DNA damage in rat brain
cells." 
                 
                It is not important, on the other hand, whether or what
analogy exists 
                between Microwave fields from cell phone and silicone breast
implants, 
                tobacco, and Low Frequency EM Fields from power lines. If we
already have 
                very reliable statistic data showing the hazard to cell
phone users. Let's 
                try to prevent the damage first before finding the real
biological mechanism 
                behind the damage. 
                 
                Barry Ma  
                -------------- 
                From: <[email protected]>, on 11/30/99 12:13 PM: 
                 
                The referenced article ponders why there might be a health
effect if there is 
                little or no "heating" of human tissue. 
                 
                The present standards for safe levels of RFR for the Western
world are 
                predicated on the assumption that biological effects are
only due to the 
                heating effect.  There have been many published articles
about cancers caused 
                by those who worked with or near high powered X-ray or radar
equipment that 
                can effect heating of body tissues.  In fact, RF generators
have been used 
                over patients arms or legs to intentionally apply heat
therapy to the inner 
                portions of these limbs. 
                 
                Oddly, only Russia focused on the possible biological
effects of long term 
                exposure to low level radiation.  As a result, they set
limits that were two 
                orders of magnitude below those of the Western world. 
                 
                The truth is that no one knows what the health effects might
be from long 
                term exposure to low level radiation.  As some have pointed
out, distance is 
                a critical element of exposure.  Cellphone antenna are often
virtually 
                touching the users skull.  Even with very low RF power out,
they can produce 
                levels within the head that are far higher than that from
radio and TV 
                transmitters that are a mile or so away.  It is a recent
phenomena for the 
                "average" person to be exposed to long term low level
radiation via the use 
                of cheap personal transmitters.  Even laborers who have used
two way radios 
                for decades did not spend the same time with the antenna
pressed to their 
                face as the typical cellphone user. 
                 
                Only time and more studies will reveal the truth.  However,
once all of the 
                class action money has been rung out of the tobacco
companies, do not be 
                surprised if next BIG class action suits head in the
direction of cellphone 
                users. 
                 
                George Alspaugh 
                -------------- 
                On Tue, 30 November 1999, [email protected] wrote: 
                  
                > The following article was presented this morning on ZDNET
with regard to the 
                > safety of Cell phones. Thought some of you might be
interested. 
                >  
                >
http://www.zdnet.com/zdnn/stories/news/0,4586,2401220,00.html 
                 
                 


                ---------
                This message is coming from the emc-pstc discussion list.
                To cancel your subscription, send mail to [email protected]
                with the single line: "unsubscribe emc-pstc" (without the
                quotes).  For help, send mail to [email protected],
                [email protected], [email protected], or
                [email protected] (the list administrators).
                

---------
This message is coming from the emc-pstc discussion list.
To cancel your subscription, send mail to [email protected]
with the single line: "unsubscribe emc-pstc" (without the
quotes).  For help, send mail to [email protected],
[email protected], [email protected], or
[email protected] (the list administrators).

Reply via email to