May I add a note of caution:
It may be worthwhile to check the permissible loading of the roof, especially
when you are in the Southwest where roofs are mostly for shade and a few drops
of rain. I guess that you don't want to appear suddenly in the conference room
below....
Bogdan.

Gary McInturff wrote:

> I'll agree with Brent, and others, the headaches of a metal room or the
> metal studs et al, in a building are going to make you pull your hair out.
> But there is an alternative to the parking lot. You may want to consider the
> roof. The ground reference can be put up there as well, especially if you
> are doing pre-compliance stuff. You don't have to give up parking space -
> which is sure to irate somebody. The roof gets a little hot, but that only
> gives you the opportunity to work in your cutoffs, and showing up to a
> meeting with the suits dressed like this is always good for a laugh!
> Gary
>
>         -----Original Message-----
>         From:   Brent DeWitt [SMTP:bdew...@ix.netcom.com]
>         Sent:   Friday, April 23, 1999 7:12 PM
>         To:     Allen Tudor; emc-p...@ieee.org
>         Subject:        RE: Precompliance Testing
>
>         Allen,
>
>         From bunches of years of designing and using sites, what I would
> suggest is,
>         IMHO, use the money to reserve a large space in the parking lot free
> of
>         obstacles.  Current construction techniques in buildings use lots of
> steel
>         "2x4s" for the walls and there will likely be steel in the floor
> above you.
>         All of these contribute to resonances in the emissions measurements
> that are
>         far too difficult to want to deal with.  The best way to do radiated
>         measurements is to be a minimalist.  Get as far away from any
> structure as
>         you can, put down a simple hardware cloth ground plane and throw a
> nylon
>         tent over the product if it rains.
>
>         Best regards,
>
>         Brent DeWitt
>         Datex-Ohmeda Medical
>         Louisville, CO
>
>         > -----Original Message-----
>         > From: owner-emc-p...@majordomo.ieee.org
>         > [mailto:owner-emc-p...@majordomo.ieee.org]On Behalf Of Allen Tudor
>         > Sent: Friday, April 23, 1999 1:27 PM
>         > To: emc-p...@ieee.org
>         > Subject: Precompliance Testing
>         >
>         >
>         > Our division is in the process of constructing a new building.  I
>         > have been told that I will be given a room in which to make
>         > pre-compliance radiated emissions measurements.  However, ferrite
>         > tiles or cones are out of the question  (I have been told that I
>         > can hang "chicken-wire" on the walls if I want to).
>         >
>         > Even though I am restricted in how much money can be spent, I
>         > have the luxury of designing in features as the building is being
>         > constructed.
>         >
>         > At a bare minimum, I think we should lay sheet metal or grid-wire
>         > on the floor after the concrete is poured.  This ground plane
>         > should be grounded at each corner by ground rods.  I am thinking
>         > that if there is no steel framework near the room, this may
>         > provide fairly good results.
>         >
>         > I would appreciate any recommendations on other cheap features
>         > that I can design in  while the building is under construction.
>         > Also, what is the minimum size the room should be?  How about
>         > power wiring in the walls and in the ceiling.  Should any
>         > measures be taken to prevent radiated energy from coupling into
>         > power wiring?
>         >
>         > Perfection is not the key issue here: repeatability is.  We have
>         > a local certified lab that I can compare my measurements with.
>         > Once the room is complete, I can repeat my measurements at the
>         > certified lab and develop the necessary correction factors.
>         >
>         > By the way, my product is dc powered shelf-level telecom
> equipment.
>         >
>         > Again, any advice will be appreciated.
>         >
>         > Thanks in advance.
>         >
>         >
>         > Allen Tudor, Compliance Engineer
>         > PairGain Technologies                  tel:  (919)875-3382
>         > 2431-153 Spring Forest Rd.           fax: (919)876-1817
>         > Raleigh, NC  27615                           email:
>         > allen_tu...@pairgain.com
>         >
>         >
>         >
>         > ---------
>         > This message is coming from the emc-pstc discussion list.
>         > To cancel your subscription, send mail to majord...@ieee.org
>         > with the single line: "unsubscribe emc-pstc" (without the
>         > quotes).  For help, send mail to ed.pr...@cubic.com,
>         > j...@gwmail.monarch.com, ri...@sdd.hp.com, or
>         > roger.volgst...@compaq.com (the list administrators).
>         >
>         >
>
>         ---------
>         This message is coming from the emc-pstc discussion list.
>         To cancel your subscription, send mail to majord...@ieee.org
>         with the single line: "unsubscribe emc-pstc" (without the
>         quotes).  For help, send mail to ed.pr...@cubic.com,
>         j...@gwmail.monarch.com, ri...@sdd.hp.com, or
>         roger.volgst...@compaq.com (the list administrators).
>
> ---------
> This message is coming from the emc-pstc discussion list.
> To cancel your subscription, send mail to majord...@ieee.org
> with the single line: "unsubscribe emc-pstc" (without the
> quotes).  For help, send mail to ed.pr...@cubic.com,
> jim_bac...@monarch.com, ri...@sdd.hp.com, or
> roger.volgst...@compaq.com (the list administrators).




---------
This message is coming from the emc-pstc discussion list.
To cancel your subscription, send mail to majord...@ieee.org
with the single line: "unsubscribe emc-pstc" (without the
quotes).  For help, send mail to ed.pr...@cubic.com,
jim_bac...@monarch.com, ri...@sdd.hp.com, or
roger.volgst...@compaq.com (the list administrators).

Reply via email to