Hi Chris,
how are you!
I would say that nothing is done wrong
if you assume that your product is in a
scope of std but you consider it as compliant
without testing.
I thing the safest way would be to include
the std in DoC and make a notion about
the compliance w/o test in the file where
you have other test reports.
This way you avoid questions about "missing" standards
and have a good answer for those who ask.
regards,
Ari Honkala
Nokia
From: rehel...@mmm.com
List-Post: emc-pstc@listserv.ieee.org
Date: 07-Dec-00
Good question................does this also hold true for 61000-3-2 if your
product is under 75 watts?
======================================================================
"Chris Allen" <chris_al...@eur.3com.com> on 12/07/2000 03:31:14 AM
Please respond to "Chris Allen" <chris_al...@eur.3com.com>
To: emc-p...@majordomo.ieee.org
cc: (bcc: Robert E. Heller/US-Corporate/3M/US)
Subject: EN 61000-3-3 listing on a DoC.
I have a question regarding EN 61000-3-3. The standard states under section
6.1
that "Tests shall not be made on equipment which is unlikely to produce
significant voltage flicker and fluctuations". This is true for the
equipment in
question.
I have been asked by a customer to included the standard on the DoC for the
unit.
My question is:
Is it valid to list a standard on a DoC in the above situation i.e. when
the
product has not been tested against it?
Any guidance would be appreciated.
Thanks,
Chris.
-------------------------------------------
This message is from the IEEE EMC Society Product Safety
Technical Committee emc-pstc discussion list.
To cancel your subscription, send mail to:
majord...@ieee.org
with the single line:
unsubscribe emc-pstc
For help, send mail to the list administrators:
Jim Bacher: jim_bac...@mail.monarch.com
Michael Garretson: pstc_ad...@garretson.org
For policy questions, send mail to:
Richard Nute: ri...@ieee.org
