Are fields stronger there?
The geologic survey people should have those numbers.
In California the fields are about 50microT which is pretty insignificant.
If you took a loop of wire that was 1 sq meter area and "flopped" it over in
the earth's field you'd have to do it within half a second even to get 0.1
milliV.
It would seem reasonable that testing to satellite magnetic field
susceptibility limits would give you conservative results.
- Robert -
-----Original Message-----
From: Peter Poulos <pet...@foxboro.com.au>
To: emc-p...@ieee.org <emc-p...@ieee.org>
List-Post: emc-pstc@listserv.ieee.org
Date: Monday, January 24, 2000 8:49 PM
Subject: Magnetic field immunity in the Arctic regions
>
>Hi folks.
>
>Has anyone had experience with demonstrating immunity to magnetic fields
>that can be expected in the Arctic / north pole regions?
>
>I'm trying to find out what level of magnetic fields can be expected as a
>worse case in order to demonstrate immunity of some electronic equipment.
>
>Is anyone aware of any standards that would cover this?
>
---------
This message is coming from the emc-pstc discussion list.
To cancel your subscription, send mail to majord...@ieee.org
with the single line: "unsubscribe emc-pstc" (without the
quotes). For help, send mail to ed.pr...@cubic.com,
jim_bac...@monarch.com, ri...@sdd.hp.com, or
roger.volgst...@compaq.com (the list administrators).
