Dear Colleagues, Today is Friday, seems to me that all of us are very tired, and the last couple of months stressed us more than we expected...
In my opinion, the ADMINISTRATORS of this VERY PROFESSIONAL GROUP deserves 100% OUR Respect. The emc-pstc "Discussion List" is like a game: with PLAYERS, with RULES and with REFEREES... It is our choice to play or not, but IF we are playing it, then ALL OF US shall respect the rules, the players and the referees. It was our acceptance when we entered the arena to display an outstanding FAIR PLAY during each and every discussion, and to do not comment any of the referees decisions. It will make the difference between us, and others. I would suggest to close this subject and to continue our discussions on emc and pstc. Have a great weekend everybody. The Life is beautiful ! Enjoy it! Respectfully yours, Constantin Constantin Bolintineanu P.Eng. DIGITAL SECURITY CONTROLS LTD. 3301 LANGSTAFF Road, L4K 4L2 CONCORD, ONTARIO, CANADA e-mail: [email protected] telephone: 905 760 3000 ext 2568 Visit our web site at www.dscgrp.com -----Original Message----- From: [email protected] [mailto:[email protected]] Sent: Friday, November 16, 2001 1:19 PM To: Gary McInturff Cc: [email protected] Subject: Decisions/Choices Gary, Thanks for going first! I agree with your comments. The worthy administrators of this forum are charged not only with the day-to-day administration of the forum, but with maintaining the established rules for its use. In some cases they must use some judgement and make tough calls to preserve both the letter and intent of those rules. I have personally received a few off-line notes from time to time suggesting that a particular discussion is a bit outside the intent of the forum. As a participant, I feel this is their call. Each of us subscribes and participates to the degree that we choose. Many of us at one time or another may have offended others, or been offended by others. In any case, the choice to continue one's participation is personal. John has chosen not to participate, as he feels he was offended. This is his choice, and I respect his right to make that choice based on his personal beliefs etc. I am certain that John would feel the same way if someone un-subscribed because they were offended by John. John (if you're still out there), all agree on your technical competence, and willingness to share your expertise. However, the recent onslaught of notes, many of which involved hair-splitting, were beginning to wear on my nerves. I encourage you to rejoin us in this worthwhile exchange of ideas, but cut us a little slack on the hair-splitting. George Alspaugh ------------------------------------------- This message is from the IEEE EMC Society Product Safety Technical Committee emc-pstc discussion list. Visit our web site at: http://www.ewh.ieee.org/soc/emcs/pstc/ To cancel your subscription, send mail to: [email protected] with the single line: unsubscribe emc-pstc For help, send mail to the list administrators: Michael Garretson: [email protected] Dave Heald [email protected] For policy questions, send mail to: Richard Nute: [email protected] Jim Bacher: [email protected] All emc-pstc postings are archived and searchable on the web at: No longer online until our new server is brought online and the old messages are imported into the new server. ------------------------------------------- This message is from the IEEE EMC Society Product Safety Technical Committee emc-pstc discussion list. Visit our web site at: http://www.ewh.ieee.org/soc/emcs/pstc/ To cancel your subscription, send mail to: [email protected] with the single line: unsubscribe emc-pstc For help, send mail to the list administrators: Michael Garretson: [email protected] Dave Heald [email protected] For policy questions, send mail to: Richard Nute: [email protected] Jim Bacher: [email protected] All emc-pstc postings are archived and searchable on the web at: No longer online until our new server is brought online and the old messages are imported into the new server.
