I read in !emc-pstc that Cook, Jack <jack.c...@cax.usa.xerox.com> wrote (in <966d119da042d21193780001fa8719c60605d...@caxmail.cax.es.xerox.com>) about 'EN 55022 limits', on Wed, 31 Oct 2001: >Are you interpreting the "other reasons" as meaning if one doesn't have a 10 >m facility, then it's ok to test at 3 m? I'm a tiny bit skeptical that this >was the intent. Or has this practice been accepted?
I think so. 10 m facilities are very rare in some countries. -- Regards, John Woodgate, OOO - Own Opinions Only. http://www.jmwa.demon.co.uk Eat mink and be dreary! ------------------------------------------- This message is from the IEEE EMC Society Product Safety Technical Committee emc-pstc discussion list. Visit our web site at: http://www.ewh.ieee.org/soc/emcs/pstc/ To cancel your subscription, send mail to: majord...@ieee.org with the single line: unsubscribe emc-pstc For help, send mail to the list administrators: Michael Garretson: pstc_ad...@garretson.org Dave Heald davehe...@mediaone.net For policy questions, send mail to: Richard Nute: ri...@ieee.org Jim Bacher: j.bac...@ieee.org All emc-pstc postings are archived and searchable on the web at: No longer online until our new server is brought online and the old messages are imported into the new server.
