<999c839e7e27d41185ec00d0b7473692024cd...@norway.int.rdel.co.uk>, Allen, John <john.al...@uk.thalesgroup.com> inimitably wrote: >Kyle make a very valid and serious point in his last paragraph => >re-engineering of vendors' products. > >"CE Marking" of a vendor's product is a "minimum requirement" - suitability >for the intended application in YOUR system is at least as important. This >means preparing an adquate purchasing specification - and demanding proof >that it has been met.
The OP had a *CB* certification, not 'CE'. This is important. An OEM product's CB certification can be (or ought to be able to be!) relied on by the OEM, but a 'CE' mark CANNOT. For electronic equipment, CE + CE does NOT equal CE. -- Regards, John Woodgate, OOO - Own Opinions Only. http://www.jmwa.demon.co.uk This message and its contents are not confidential, privileged or protected by law. Access is only authorised by the intended recipient - this means YOU! The contents may be disclosed to, or used by, anyone and stored or copied in any medium. If you are not the intended recipient, please advise the sender yesterday at the latest. ------------------------------------------- This message is from the IEEE EMC Society Product Safety Technical Committee emc-pstc discussion list. Visit our web site at: http://www.ewh.ieee.org/soc/emcs/pstc/ To cancel your subscription, send mail to: majord...@ieee.org with the single line: unsubscribe emc-pstc For help, send mail to the list administrators: Michael Garretson: pstc_ad...@garretson.org Dave Heald davehe...@mediaone.net For policy questions, send mail to: Richard Nute: ri...@ieee.org Jim Bacher: j.bac...@ieee.org All emc-pstc postings are archived and searchable on the web at: http://www.rcic.com/ click on "Virtual Conference Hall,"
