I read in !emc-pstc that Andre, Pierre-Marie <pierre- marie.an...@intel.com> wrote (in <9985493A802AD5118C4E0090274627535EC2EE @swsmsx34.isw.intel.com>) about 'Regulatory General Discussion : ouput of Compliance group', on Mon, 17 Dec 2001: >The good argument is really in the FULL implication of the Compliance group >in the design process right ? with full power to sign off the design changes
IMHO, the European EMC and Low Voltage Directives effectively require this to be the case. -- Regards, John Woodgate, OOO - Own Opinions Only. http://www.jmwa.demon.co.uk After swimming across the Hellespont, I felt like a Hero. ------------------------------------------- This message is from the IEEE EMC Society Product Safety Technical Committee emc-pstc discussion list. Visit our web site at: http://www.ewh.ieee.org/soc/emcs/pstc/ To cancel your subscription, send mail to: majord...@ieee.org with the single line: unsubscribe emc-pstc For help, send mail to the list administrators: Michael Garretson: pstc_ad...@garretson.org Dave Heald davehe...@mediaone.net For policy questions, send mail to: Richard Nute: ri...@ieee.org Jim Bacher: j.bac...@ieee.org All emc-pstc postings are archived and searchable on the web at: No longer online until our new server is brought online and the old messages are imported into the new server.
