Not necessarily, you may want to "cost reduce" the product in the future and may need the 'A' to 'B' overhead.
Bob Heller 3M Product Safety, 76-1-01 St. Paul, MN 55107-1208 Tel: 651- 778-6336 Fax: 651-778-6252 ===================================================================================== "John Shinn" <john.shinn@sanmin To: "'Gary McInturff'" <gary.mcintu...@worldwidepackets.com> a-sci.com> john.sh...@sanmina-sci.com "'Pierre SELVA'" <e.l...@wanadoo.fr> 07/29/2002 09:22 "'Forum Safety-emc'" <emc-p...@majordomo.ieee.org> AM cc: (bcc: Robert E. Heller/US-Corporate/3M/US) Please respond to Subject: RE: FCC and Professional Scanner : Verification or certification "John Shinn" Obviously there is considerable disagreement between myself and what appears to be the rest of the group. The positions regarding the consideration of the scanner as a Class A device were well thought out. I will bow to the consenses of the group However, even if the scanner were intended only for an Industrial / commercial market, and it could meet the Class B limits, wouldn't it be better to issue a DoC in order to open up more markets for the device? John ------------------------------------------- This message is from the IEEE EMC Society Product Safety Technical Committee emc-pstc discussion list. Visit our web site at: http://www.ewh.ieee.org/soc/emcs/pstc/ To cancel your subscription, send mail to: majord...@ieee.org with the single line: unsubscribe emc-pstc For help, send mail to the list administrators: Ron Pickard: emc-p...@hypercom.com Dave Heald: davehe...@attbi.com For policy questions, send mail to: Richard Nute: ri...@ieee.org Jim Bacher: j.bac...@ieee.org All emc-pstc postings are archived and searchable on the web at: http://ieeepstc.mindcruiser.com/ Click on "browse" and then "emc-pstc mailing list"