I read in !emc-pstc that richwo...@tycoint.com wrote (in <846BF526A205F8 4BA2B6045BBF7E9A6A01F13E61@flbocexu05>) about 'EN 61000-3-3 A1', on Thu, 21 Feb 2002:
>Is there anyone that disagrees that limited inrush current is not a >requirement under the amended standard? I think I should not fail to deny that I don't disagree with you. Or not. Inrush current DOES have to be taken into account, because of the limits on dmax and d(t). I spent a lot of time on that feature of the standard, as a member of the IEC WG responsible for it. It was very obscurely dealt with in the original standard and that has been improved greatly in the Millennium Amendment. -- Regards, John Woodgate, OOO - Own Opinions Only. http://www.jmwa.demon.co.uk Interested in professional sound reinforcement and distribution? Then go to http://www.isce.org.uk PLEASE do NOT copy news posts to me by E-MAIL! ------------------------------------------- This message is from the IEEE EMC Society Product Safety Technical Committee emc-pstc discussion list. Visit our web site at: http://www.ewh.ieee.org/soc/emcs/pstc/ To cancel your subscription, send mail to: majord...@ieee.org with the single line: unsubscribe emc-pstc For help, send mail to the list administrators: Ron Pickard: emc-p...@hypercom.com Dave Heald: davehe...@mediaone.net For policy questions, send mail to: Richard Nute: ri...@ieee.org Jim Bacher: j.bac...@ieee.org All emc-pstc postings are archived and searchable on the web at: http://ieeepstc.mindcruiser.com/ Click on "browse" and then "emc-pstc mailing list"
