Massimo, 

Just to underscore what others have stated, long ago in one 
of the resistor mfr's catalogues, there was a discussion of 
this topic.  Essentially, do not violate the DC wattage 
rating of the resistor based on a 1 second time period. 

As an example, a 1W, 1 Ohm, carbon composition resistor 
should be able to handle 

a. 1A (or 1V potential) continuously, 
b. 2A (or 2V potential) at 50% duty cycle, i.e. 1/2 second duration, 
c. 4A at 25% duty cycle, i.e. 1/4 second duration, 
etc ... 
all the way up to the maximum voltage rating of the resistor. 
For a 600V rated resistor, this would mean the maximum 
pulse allowed would be 600V peak for less than or equal 
to 1/600th second or 1.6 milliseconds. This particular 
conclusion I have doubts about.  I explain below. 

Fusing characteristics of wires is non-linear and therefore 
for large currents through a resistor (I don't know what 
that might be), I doubt the above.  But for low currents, 
let's say less than 10 times the current rating of the resistor 
for the sake of argument (in the case above, that would 
mean anything less than 10 amps), I think that's acceptable. 
This is all spectulation and I am by no means an expert. 

But, if there is any question, please consult the mfr. 

- Doug McKean 



-------------------------------------------
This message is from the IEEE EMC Society Product Safety
Technical Committee emc-pstc discussion list.

Visit our web site at:  http://www.ewh.ieee.org/soc/emcs/pstc/

To cancel your subscription, send mail to:
     majord...@ieee.org
with the single line:
     unsubscribe emc-pstc

For help, send mail to the list administrators:
     Ron Pickard:              emc-p...@hypercom.com
     Dave Heald:               davehe...@mediaone.net

For policy questions, send mail to:
     Richard Nute:           ri...@ieee.org
     Jim Bacher:             j.bac...@ieee.org

All emc-pstc postings are archived and searchable on the web at:
    http://ieeepstc.mindcruiser.com/
    Click on "browse" and then "emc-pstc mailing list"

Reply via email to