Hi Folks I once (about 12 years ago) had the dubious priviledge of being the Comittee Secretary for the UK BSI standards committee dealing with these beasts at British & International levels!
This question was never asked (that was probably before my time!) but it was my impression that these had fallen into the "too difficult" category and the Commission at the time of the Directive (1972/73)ducked the issue to ensure that it got agreed and that all the more common items got dealt with.. There certainly was (and probably still is - which is why the situation in the Directive does not appear to have changed) a considerable difference of opinion between various countries as their safety and what the voltage and particular pulse tim/energy limits should apply. Effectively, countries with small fields (like many in Europe) wanted low power units which probably were safe enough for general use, and possibly could have been kept within the LVD by some form of energy limitation kluge. However, countries with "big" - or "very big" (like Australia and New Zealand, etc.) - fields wanted units with lots more energy to avoid the deterent effect being substantially reduced by contact with conductive vegetation, etc. In the end (after I left BSI) I believe that some units were finally covered under Part 2 Sections of IEC 60335 - but I personally doubt that they are the high power versions. Does'nt really explain the situation fully but might give you some idea of what was/is behind the exclusion - and do'nt forget that there are other exclusions as well. Regards John Allen ----- Original Message ----- From: "Ablewisp - Compliance Consultants" <s...@ablewisp.com> To: "Emc-Pstc" <emc-p...@majordomo.ieee.org> Sent: Thursday, August 29, 2002 4:11 PM Subject: Electric Fence Controllers > > Hi > I've been asked why electric fence controllers are "outside the scope" of > the LVD. > I don't know much about them and assume its because they generate voltages > exceeding the LVD upper limit. > Is my assumption correct? > > Many thanks > > Stuart Miller > > > ------------------------------------------- > This message is from the IEEE EMC Society Product Safety > Technical Committee emc-pstc discussion list. > > Visit our web site at: http://www.ewh.ieee.org/soc/emcs/pstc/ > > To cancel your subscription, send mail to: > majord...@ieee.org > with the single line: > unsubscribe emc-pstc > > For help, send mail to the list administrators: > Ron Pickard: emc-p...@hypercom.com > Dave Heald: davehe...@attbi.com > > For policy questions, send mail to: > Richard Nute: ri...@ieee.org > Jim Bacher: j.bac...@ieee.org > > All emc-pstc postings are archived and searchable on the web at: > http://ieeepstc.mindcruiser.com/ > Click on "browse" and then "emc-pstc mailing list" ------------------------------------------- This message is from the IEEE EMC Society Product Safety Technical Committee emc-pstc discussion list. Visit our web site at: http://www.ewh.ieee.org/soc/emcs/pstc/ To cancel your subscription, send mail to: majord...@ieee.org with the single line: unsubscribe emc-pstc For help, send mail to the list administrators: Ron Pickard: emc-p...@hypercom.com Dave Heald: davehe...@attbi.com For policy questions, send mail to: Richard Nute: ri...@ieee.org Jim Bacher: j.bac...@ieee.org All emc-pstc postings are archived and searchable on the web at: http://ieeepstc.mindcruiser.com/ Click on "browse" and then "emc-pstc mailing list"
