Floating "grounds" on PCBs tend to be problematic, especially at high
frequencies. Minimizing the effective capacitive reactance between the
floating "ground" and the real ground will ensure that the floating
ground is "AC Cold". I don't just mean bypassing it with (say) a few
thousand uF of electrolytic capacitance, but instead ensuring minimal
capacitive reactance to ground across the entire frequency band of
interest. This usually entails (as an example) paralleling something
like a 0.1uF cap, and with an NP0 1000pF cap (or similar). 

If the floating "ground" not properly decoupled to the main ground, and
it is a significant proportion of a HF wavelength, then it can have very
high AC voltages superimposed and act as a marvelous antenna.

Reducing the size of the floating "ground" is always a good plan.
Increasing it merely means that you have a larger potential antenna.

Bob Wilson
TIR Systems Ltd.
Vancouver.

-----Original Message-----
From: Paolo Peruzzi [mailto:paolo.peru...@esaote.com] 
Sent: February 25, 2002 7:34 AM
To: emc-p...@majordomo.ieee.org
Subject: PCB floating area layout


Hi all,
I'm dealing with a PCB that has a floating section isolated from the
rest
of the board for safety purposes (patient applied part).
I found out some problems with emissions, due to the coupling between
the
floating part and of the PCB and the earthed one.

My questions are concerning the layout design of the floating area:

1) Is it best to minimize the HF capacitive coupling between the earthed
ground and the floating ground or to maximize it?
2) Is it best to reduce the amount of the floating ground or to increase
it?

Does it depend on the goodness of the "main ground", i.e. how much it is
"cold" ?  (I see the board as a dipole with one end connected to earth,
and
the other floating).

Thanks,
p.p.

-------------------------------------------------------------
ESAOTE S.p.A.                     Paolo Peruzzi
Research & Product Development    Design Quality Control
Via di Caciolle,15                tel:+39.055.4229306
I- 50127 Florence                 fax:+39.055.4223305
        e-mail: paolo.peru...@esaote.com




-------------------------------------------
This message is from the IEEE EMC Society Product Safety
Technical Committee emc-pstc discussion list.

Visit our web site at:  http://www.ewh.ieee.org/soc/emcs/pstc/

To cancel your subscription, send mail to:
     majord...@ieee.org
with the single line:
     unsubscribe emc-pstc

For help, send mail to the list administrators:
     Ron Pickard:              emc-p...@hypercom.com
     Dave Heald:               davehe...@mediaone.net

For policy questions, send mail to:
     Richard Nute:           ri...@ieee.org
     Jim Bacher:             j.bac...@ieee.org

All emc-pstc postings are archived and searchable on the web at:
    http://ieeepstc.mindcruiser.com/
    Click on "browse" and then "emc-pstc mailing list"

-------------------------------------------
This message is from the IEEE EMC Society Product Safety
Technical Committee emc-pstc discussion list.

Visit our web site at:  http://www.ewh.ieee.org/soc/emcs/pstc/

To cancel your subscription, send mail to:
     majord...@ieee.org
with the single line:
     unsubscribe emc-pstc

For help, send mail to the list administrators:
     Ron Pickard:              emc-p...@hypercom.com
     Dave Heald:               davehe...@mediaone.net

For policy questions, send mail to:
     Richard Nute:           ri...@ieee.org
     Jim Bacher:             j.bac...@ieee.org

All emc-pstc postings are archived and searchable on the web at:
    http://ieeepstc.mindcruiser.com/
    Click on "browse" and then "emc-pstc mailing list"

Reply via email to